1 Yes I heard. On one occasion, he lived in Ukkattha realized, at the root of the tree the Royal Hall, on Grove Subhaga. There he said to the monks thus: "Monks" - "Venerable sir," replied. Realized it said:
2 "Monks, I introduce to you a treatise on the root of all things, listen and just watch what I say." "Yes, sir," replied.
(common man)
three monks here, niepouczony ordinary man, no self-respecting precious and unfamiliar with their Science and undisciplined in it, who does not respect real people and is unfamiliar their Science and undisciplined in her
4 From the land of no perception of the earth, having the perception of the land of the earth, imagine (being the) ground, imagine (this being) in the ground, imagine (being that) off the ground, represents land under a " my "rozmiłowuje the ground. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
5 with water is the perception of water, taking water from the water's perception, imagine (being the) water, imagine (this being) in water, imagine (this being) out of the water, imagine the water which is "my" in rozmiłowuje water. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
6 With Fire is the perception of fire, with flames of fire perception, imagine (being the) fire, imagine (this being) on \u200b\u200bfire, imagine (being the) outside of the fire, which represents fire, "my", rozmiłowuje set on fire. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
7 The perception of air is air from the air with the perception of the air, imagine (being the) air, imagine (being this), in the air, imagine (being the) outside air, imagine the air being "my", rozmiłowuje in the air. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
8 of beings is the perception of beings, beings with the perception of beings, imagine (this being) creatures, imagine (being of) in creatures, imagine (being the) outside beings, imagine beings that are "mine", in rozmiłowuje beings. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
9 with the gods is the perception of the gods, having the perception of the gods of the gods, imagine (being the) gods, imagine (this being) the gods, imagine (being this), except the gods, the gods who imagines "my" rozmiłowuje the gods. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
10 With the Lord Ras (Pajapati) has the perception of Mr Ras, in view of your perception of the Lord Ras Ras, imagine (being that), Mr. Ras, imagine (this being) in the Lord Ras, imagine (being the) outside Mr Ras, you imagine Ras that is "my", rozmiłowuje Ras in the Lord. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
11 From Brahma Brahma is the perception of having the perception of Brahma Brahma, imagine (being the) Brahma, imagine (this being) in Brahma, imagine (being the) outside of Brahma, Brahma represents which is "my", rozmiłowuje in Brahma. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
12 With Strumienistej Radiation (Abhassara) has the perception Strumienistej Radiation, with the perception Strumienistej Strumienistej Radiation Radiation, imagine (being this) Strumienistą Radiation, imagine (this being) in Strumienistej Radiation, imagine (being the) outside Strumienistą Radiation, imagine Strumienistą radiation which is "my", rozmiłowuje in Strumienistej Radiation. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
13 The Shining Glory (Subhakinha) has the perception Shining Glory, with the perception of the Shining Shining Glory Glory, imagine (being the) shining glory, imagine (being this), in Shining Glory, imagine (being the) outside of shining glory, imagine being the shining glory of "my" , rozmiłowuje in Shining Glory. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
14 With the Great Big Fruit Fruit is the perception of having the perception of the Great Big Fruit Fruit, imagine (being the) Great fruit, imagine (Being this), in the Great Fruit, imagine (being the) outside the Great fruit, fruit which imagines the Great "I" in the Grand rozmiłowuje Fruit. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
15 The Transcendental Being (Abhibhu) has the perception of the Transcendental Being, having the perception of the Transcendental Being Transcendental Being, imagine (being this) Transcendental Being, imagine (this being) in the Transcendental Being, imagine (being the) outside the Transcendental Being, imagine Transcendental The essence of which is "my", the Transcendental rozmiłowuje Indeed. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
16 From the base of infinite space is the perception of the base of infinite space, with the base of infinite space perception of the base of infinite space, imagine (being the) base of infinite space, imagine (this being) in the base of infinite space, imagine (being the) outside the base of infinite space, represents the base of infinite space which is "my", rozmiłowuje in the base of infinite space. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
17 From the base of infinite awareness is the perception of the base of infinite consciousness, with the base of infinite consciousness the perception of the base of infinite consciousness, imagine (being the) base of infinite consciousness, imagine (this being) in the base of infinite consciousness, imagine (being the) outside the base of infinite consciousness, represents the base of infinite consciousness which is "my", rozmiłowuje in the base of infinite consciousness. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
18 From the base of nothingness is the perception of the base of nothingness, Having the base of nothingness of nothingness imagines perception of the base (being the) base of nothingness, imagine (being this), the base of nothingness, imagine (being the) outside the base of nothingness, imagine being the base of nothingness, "my", rozmiłowuje in the base of nothingness. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
19 From the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception is the perception of the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, with the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, perception of the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception imagine (being the) base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, imagine (this being) in the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception imagine (being the) outside the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception represents the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception as 'my', rozmiłowuje in the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
20 The perception of visible light is visible, with the visual perception of the visible, imagine (being that) visible, imagine (this being) in the visible, imagine (being the) outside the visible, Visible imagines being "my", rozmiłowuje in the visible spectrum. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
21 The audible perception is audible, with the audible perception of audible, imagine (this being) heard, imagine (this being) in the audible, imagine (being the) outside the audible, audible imagines being "my", rozmiłowuje in audible. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
22 The perception is appreciable appreciably, with the perceived perception of tangible, imagine (being this) appreciably, imagine (being this) appreciably, imagine (being the) outside the tangible, felt imagines being "my", rozmiłowuje appreciably. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
23 From poznawalnego poznawalnego perception is, with the perception poznawalnego poznawalnego, imagine (being that), cognition, imagine (this being) in cognition, imagine (being the) outside of cognition, which represents cognizable "my", rozmiłowuje in cognition. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
24 The perception of unity is unity, unity with the unity of perception, imagine (being the) one, imagine (being this), in unity, imagine (being this), except one, and represents the unity of being the "my", rozmiłowuje in unity. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
25 with diversity is the diversity of perception, given the diversity of perceptions of diversity, imagine (being the) diversity, imagine (being this), the diversity, imagine (this being) beyond diversity, represents the diversity of which is "my", rozmiłowuje in diversity . Why this is so? I say, he did not know it fully.
26 The perception of everything is everything, everything having the perception of all, imagine (being that) everyone imagines (it being) in all, imagine (being that), after all, represents everything which is "my", rozmiłowuje on everything. Why is that? I say, he did not know it fully.
27 From Nibbana Nibbana is perception, perception of having to Nibbana Nibbana, imagine (being that), Nibbana, imagine (this being) in Nibbana, imagine (being the) outside of Nibbana, which is Nibbana imagines "my" rozmiłowuje in Nibbana. Why is this so? I say, he did not know it fully.
(Monk in training)
28 monks, a monk in the (higher) training, whose mind has not yet reached liberation, and who still aspires to the highest security from bondage:
29 From the land has direct knowledge of the ground, with the land direct knowledge of the land, should not imagine (being the) ground, and should not to think (this being) on \u200b\u200bearth, should not to think (this being) off the ground, should not imagine being a land of "my", I say, he should know fully.
1930-1951 with water ... fire ... Air ... gods ... Lord Ras ... Brahma ... those with Strumienistej Radiation ... with those of the Shining Glory ... with those of the Great Fruit ... the Transcendental Being ... infinite space ... infinite consciousness ... nothingness ... neither-perception-nor-non-perception ... Visible ... audible ... appreciable ... poznawalnego ... unity ... ... With all the diversity has direct knowledge of everything, with direct knowledge of everything about everything, should not to think (this being) to all and should not to think (this being) in all things, and should not to think (this being) above all, should not imagine anything being "my", I say, he should know fully.
52 With Nibbana has direct knowledge of Nibbana, the Nibbana having direct knowledge of Nibbana, he should not imagine (being this) Nibbana, and should not to think (this being) in Nibbana, and should not to think (this being) outside of Nibbana, he should not imagine being Nibbana "my", I say, he should know fully.
Arahat - 1
53 monks, a monk, who is running out arahantship mutilated, which lived a holy life, done what was to be done, put down the burden, attained the highest goal, destroyed the bonds of existence and is actually triggered by the final knowledge:
54 land has direct knowledge of the land, the land having direct knowledge of the earth, can not imagine (being the) earth, can not imagine (this being) in the earth can not imagine (being that) off the ground, can not imagine being a land of "my". Why is that? I say that fully met.
1955-1976 with water ... fire ... Air ... creatures ... Lord Ras ... Brahma ... those with Strumienistej Radiation ... with those of the Shining Glory ... with those of the Great Fruit ... the Transcendental Being ... infinite space ... infinite consciousness ... nothingness ... neither-perception-nor-non-perception ... Visible ... audible ... appreciable ... poznawalnego ... unity ... Diversity ... everything ... I say that fully met.
77 Nibbana with direct knowledge of Nibbana, the Nibbana having direct knowledge of Nibbana, can not imagine (being that), Nibbana; not imagine (this being) in Nibbana, can not imagine (being the) outside of Nibbana, can not imagine being Nibbana " my " Why is that? I say that fully met.
Arahat - 2
78 monks, a monk, who is running out arahantship mutilated, who lived a holy life, done what was to be done, put down the burden, attained the highest goal, destroyed the bonds of existence and is actually triggered by the final knowledge:
79 From the land has direct knowledge of the land, the land having direct knowledge of the earth, can not imagine (being the) earth, can not imagine (this being) in the earth can not imagine (being that) off the ground, can not imagine being earth, "mine." Why is that? Due to the non-exhaustion of lust for lust.
80-102 with water ... The Nibbana ... Why is this so? Due to the non-exhaustion of lust for lust.
Arahat -3
103 monks, a monk, who is running out arahantship mutilated, who lived a holy life, done what was to be done, put down the burden, attained the highest goal, destroyed the bonds of existence and is actually triggered by the final knowledge:
104 From the land has direct knowledge of the ground, with the land direct knowledge of the earth, can not imagine (being the) earth, can not imagine (this being) in the earth can not imagine (being that) off the ground, can not imagine being a land of "my". Why is that? Due to the non-exhaustion of hatred by hatred.
105-127 with water ... of Nibbana ... Why is that? Due to the non-exhaustion of hatred by hatred.
Arahat - 4
128 monks, a monk, who is running out arahantship mutilated, who lived a holy life, done what was to be done, put down the burden, attained the highest goal, destroyed the bonds of existence and is actually triggered by the final knowledge:
129 From the land has direct knowledge of the land, the land having direct knowledge of the earth, can not imagine (being the) earth, can not imagine (this being) in the earth can not imagine (being the ) off the ground, can not imagine being a land of "my". Why is this so? Due to the non-delusion by the exhaustion of delusion.
130-152 with water ... The Nibbana ... Why is this so? Due to the non-delusion by the exhaustion of delusion
Tathagata -1
154 monks, the Tathagata Arahat Fully Awake:
From the land has a direct knowledge of the land, the land having direct knowledge of the earth, can not imagine (being the) earth, can not imagine (this being) in the earth can not imagine (being that) off the ground, can not imagine being a land "mine." Why is this so? Say that the Tathagata has fully met until the end.
155-177 From the land of ... The Nibbana. Why is this so? Say that the Tathagata has fully met until the end.
Tathagata -2
178 monks, the Tathagata Arahat Fully Awake:
179 land has direct knowledge of the land, the land having direct knowledge of the earth, can not imagine (being that) the earth, can not imagine (this being) in the earth can not imagine (being that) off the ground, can not imagine being a land of "my". Why is this so? Tathagata knows that the lovers is the root of suffering and of that being the birth and old age and death that whatever is, therefore, say that the exhaustion of desire, loss, suspension, resignation and uwolnienieniem in every way, he discovered the highest total Awakening.
180-202 with water ... fire ... Air ... gods ... Lord Ras ... Brahma ... those with Strumienistej Radiation ... with those of the Shining Glory ... with those of the Great Fruit ... of Transcendental Beings ... infinite space ... infinite consciousness ... nothingness ... neither-perception-nor-non-perception ... Visible ... audible ... appreciable ... poznawalnego ... unity ... Diversity ... everything ... Nibbana has direct knowledge of Nibbana, the Nibbana having direct knowledge of Nibbana, can not imagine (being this) Nibbana; not imagine (this being) in Nibbana, can not imagine (being the) outside of Nibbana, Nibbana can not imagine being "mine." Why is this so? Tathagata knows that the lovers is the root of suffering and of that being the birth and old age and death to anything is, therefore, say that the exhaustion of desire, loss suspension, resignation and uwolnienieniem in every way, he discovered the highest total Awakening.
203 Realized That's what he said. These monks are not enamored of the words the Blessed One.
0 comments:
Post a Comment